Dose–Turbidity Response of Poly Aluminium Chloride in Raw-Water Treatment: Jar Tests and Conditional Feed-Rate Estimation

Authors

  • Ratna Kristina Tarigan Teknik Kimia, Politeknik Teknologi Kimia Industri, Indonesia.
  • Paolo Giovanni Briante University Mediterranea of Reggio Calabria, Reggio Calabria, Italy. https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0209-7024

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.67922/ftnctn37

Keywords:

poly aluminium chloride, jar test, raw-water clarification, turbidity removal, coagulant dosing, chemical feed rate

Abstract

Poly aluminium chloride (PAC) is used to destabilize suspended and colloidal particles during raw-water clarification. This study evaluates the relationship between PAC dose and residual turbidity for five raw-water samples and estimates a corresponding chemical feed rate for a reported raw-water flow of 200 L/s. Jar tests were conducted using 1,000 mL samples, six PAC doses (30, 32.5, 35, 37.5, 40, and 42.5 mg/L), rapid mixing at 140 rpm for 5 min, slow mixing at 50 rpm for 10 min, and settling for 20 min. Initial turbidity ranged from 25.2 to 51.7 NTU, while final turbidity across all tested conditions ranged from 0.567 to 3.73 NTU. The lowest observed final turbidity for each raw-water sample occurred at 37.5 mg/L for initial turbidities of 25.2, 31.8, and 51.7 NTU, and at 42.5 mg/L for initial turbidities of 27.3 and 30.6 NTU. Thus, the dataset does not support a universal turbidity-minimizing optimum of 30 mg/L. However, 30 mg/L was the lowest tested dose and produced final turbidity values of 1.16–3.73 NTU across the five samples. A feed-rate estimate of approximately 56.07 mL/s at 30 mg/L is obtained only if the reported 10.7% PAC concentration is interpreted as 107 mg/mL (w/v); this concentration basis must be confirmed before operational use. The results provide a site-specific dose-response assessment, but replication, water-chemistry measurements, and field validation are required before the dose can be generalized or described as economically optimal.

References

Duan, J., & Gregory, J. (2003). Coagulation by hydrolysing metal salts. Advances in Colloid and Interface Science, 100–102, 475–502. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0001-8686(02)00067-2

Holloway, N., Wu, S., & Zhu, J. (2022). Evaluating Al-based coagulants for drinking water facilities using Jar test and CCD/RSM analysis. Journal of Environmental Science and Health, Part A, 57(13–14), 1138–1145. https://doi.org/10.1080/10934529.2022.2160601

Kementerian Kesehatan Republik Indonesia. (2017). Peraturan Menteri Kesehatan Republik Indonesia Nomor 32 Tahun 2017 tentang standar baku mutu kesehatan lingkungan dan persyaratan kesehatan air untuk keperluan higiene sanitasi, kolam renang, solus per aqua, dan pemandian umum. https://jdih.kemkes.go.id/storage/documents/pdfs/2017permenkes032.pdf

Mazloomi, S., Ghodsei, S., Amraei, P., & Bonyadi, Z. (2018). Data on the removal of turbidity from aqueous solutions using polyaluminum chloride. Data in Brief, 20, 371–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dib.2018.08.024

Pernitsky, D. J., & Edzwald, J. K. (2006). Selection of alum and polyaluminum coagulants: Principles and applications. Journal of Water Supply: Research and Technology-AQUA, 55(2), 121–141. https://doi.org/10.2166/aqua.2006.062

World Health Organization. (2017). Water quality and health: Review of turbidity. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/WHO-FWC-WSH-17.01

Yan, M., Wang, D., Ni, J., Qu, J., Chow, C. W. K., & Liu, H. (2008b). Mechanism of natural organic matter removal by polyaluminum chloride: Effect of coagulant particle size and hydrolysis kinetics. Water Research, 42(13), 3361–3370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2008.04.017

Yan, M., Wang, D., Yu, J., Ni, J., Edwards, M., & Qu, J. (2008). Enhanced coagulation with polyaluminum chlorides: Role of pH/alkalinity and speciation. Chemosphere, 71(9), 1665–1673. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2008.01.019

Zainal-Abideen, M., Aris, A., Yusof, F., Abdul-Majid, Z., Selamat, A., & Omar, S. I. (2012). Optimizing the coagulation process in a drinking water treatment plant: Comparison between traditional and statistical experimental design jar tests. Water Science and Technology, 65(3), 496–503. https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2012.561

Downloads

Published

2024-04-01

Issue

Section

Artikel Teknik Kimia

How to Cite

Kristina Tarigan, R., & Briante, P. G. (2024). Dose–Turbidity Response of Poly Aluminium Chloride in Raw-Water Treatment: Jar Tests and Conditional Feed-Rate Estimation. Jurnal Vokasi Teknik, 2(1), 01-11. https://doi.org/10.67922/ftnctn37

Similar Articles

21-30 of 35

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.